Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Another Stab at the Constitution ( Week 7)




“As I have suggested elsewhere, clarifying and expanding the Eighth Amendment could help. It should specifically state that excessive terms of incarceration are prohibited, just as it bans excessive fines. It should expressly prohibit mandatory sentences so that every case gets the benefit of individualized attention by a judge. And it should insist that legislatures create a record showing that they considered empirical evidence about the law's likely impact.”  by Rachel Barkow

            This quote emphasizes that long terms of incarceration should be prohibited as the eighth amendment prohibits excessive fines and unusual punishments. As my understanding, Barkow suggests that this should be specifically stated and clarified in the eighth amendment as it says excessive fines. She also suggests that mandatory sentence should be prohibited. It suggests that each convicted should have an assigned judge and penalize them according to their crimes and history. There should be clear evidence of crimes and penalize them according to their crimes.

This quote caught my attention because this is seen a lot today. In my understanding, there’re people that deserve to spend a lot of years in prison. For example, those who have committed murder or rape. Every criminal deserves to be in prison including those who commit minor crimes. However, I think that 30-60 years is more than enough for a person to recognize their faults. In my opinion, 30- 40 years would be good for major crimes like murders.  Spending sixty year in prison or death penalty is frustrating. I think that regarding the offenders’ behaviors and conducts, through the years lower the years should be considered.  I think that 30 years in more than enough for them to analyze their crimes and behaviors, if the person is not mentally ill.  I’m against death penalty and lifetime prison, since this don’t give them the opportunity to demonstrate that they change, and that they can be a new person. 

I think that injustice is still seen in the United States. I agree that all criminals deserve to be in prison and pay for their crimes. However, there must be limits depending on their actions. I think that injustice is mostly seen because of the represented authorities and judges. Like Jamal Greene said, “in a democracy, no one person should wield so much power for so long. Article III of the Constitution provides that federal judges shall hold their offices during good behavior” . After being working many years, an old judge couldn’t be physical and mental stable to lead with such criminal cases.  A good example of injustice would be, the case of Kalief Browder. A college student who was convicted of robbery without any clear evidence. He spent three years in prison without been convicted of a crime, and no judge could stop that. As a result, in 2015, he committed suicide because of the frustration he lived.  I think that playing with people’s lives is not a joke, and there should be responsible, physical and mental stable judges to stop injustice.





No comments:

Post a Comment

Interest Groups by Olson ( Week 15)

“Notice that the interests that all of these diverse types of organizations are expected to further are for the most part common intere...