“As I have suggested elsewhere, clarifying and
expanding the Eighth Amendment could help. It should specifically state that
excessive terms of incarceration are prohibited, just as it bans excessive fines.
It should expressly prohibit mandatory sentences so that every case gets the
benefit of individualized attention by a judge. And it should insist that
legislatures create a record showing that they considered empirical evidence
about the law's likely impact.” by
Rachel Barkow
This
quote emphasizes that long terms of incarceration should be prohibited as the
eighth amendment prohibits excessive fines and unusual punishments. As my
understanding, Barkow suggests that this should be specifically stated and
clarified in the eighth amendment as it says excessive fines. She also suggests
that mandatory sentence should be prohibited. It suggests that each convicted
should have an assigned judge and penalize them according to their crimes and
history. There should be clear evidence of crimes and penalize them according
to their crimes.
This quote caught my
attention because this is seen a lot today. In my understanding, there’re
people that deserve to spend a lot of years in prison. For example, those who
have committed murder or rape. Every criminal deserves to be in prison
including those who commit minor crimes. However, I think that 30-60 years is
more than enough for a person to recognize their faults. In my opinion, 30- 40
years would be good for major crimes like murders. Spending sixty year in prison or death penalty
is frustrating. I think that regarding the offenders’ behaviors and conducts,
through the years lower the years should be considered. I think that 30 years in more than enough for
them to analyze their crimes and behaviors, if the person is not mentally ill. I’m against death penalty and lifetime prison,
since this don’t give them the opportunity to demonstrate that they change, and
that they can be a new person.
I think that injustice is
still seen in the United States. I agree that all criminals deserve to be in
prison and pay for their crimes. However, there must be limits depending on
their actions. I think that injustice is mostly seen because of the represented
authorities and judges. Like Jamal Greene said, “in a democracy, no one person
should wield so much power for so long. Article III of the Constitution
provides that federal judges shall hold their offices during good behavior” . After
being working many years, an old judge couldn’t be physical and mental stable
to lead with such criminal cases. A good
example of injustice would be, the case of Kalief Browder. A college student
who was convicted of robbery without any clear evidence. He spent three years
in prison without been convicted of a crime, and no judge could stop that. As a
result, in 2015, he committed suicide because of the frustration he lived. I think that playing with people’s lives is
not a joke, and there should be responsible, physical and mental stable judges
to stop injustice.
No comments:
Post a Comment